Graduate School of Social and Political Studies

Degree Title: Taught Masters in Social Research

 

Examination Number: 3134133

Matriculation Number: 0231341

Gregory Butler

 

 

 

Dissertation Title:

Sustainability and Transport: The Case for an Increased Role for Cycling

 

 

 

 

Word Count: 14,989 Excluding Title Page, Abstract, References, and Appendices.

 

 

I hereby declare that this dissertation is my own work and all references have been cited as appropriate:

 

 

 

Gregory Butler
Abstract: One of the key environmental debates occurring at present involves the role of the automobile, and our continued ability to depend on it as a foundational transportation system. The car appears to be a lightning rod for controversy.  Often, the solution for the problems posed by automobile domination is public transit.   There certainly is a strong case to be made for increased public transportation; however, this dissertation examines the hypothesis that cycling is also particularly suited to play a central role in the urban transportation system.  This paper examines some of the criticism against cars – in particular their possible role in contributing to global warning, as well as accusations that they damage the fabric of civic life.  The case for cycling is then examined, first by looking at some of its positive aspects, and later by attempting to determine its ability to serve as a significant urban transportation mode.  This later examination involves some historical analysis, but primarily is carried out by comparing characteristics of cyclists at the local (York) and national level in the United Kingdom.

 


Acknowledgement: No piece of academic work can stand on its own, and certainly my dissertation is no exception.  I would like to thank first, Dr. Bob Hodgart for his many insights into possible approaches for the study of my topic, for his excellent comments on ways to improve the presentation of my findings and most specifically for his generosity with his time. 

 

Secondly, I would like to thank my course convenor Dr. Andrew Thompson as well as the lecturers and support staff at Edinburgh University for helping me to access resources needed for my research.

 

Third, I would like to thank Dr. Philippe Crabbé, Dr. Richard Day and Dr. Martin Daly for their willingness to serve as references for my studies at Edinburgh.  Also I wish to acknowledge the taxpayers of Canada for permitting me the opportunity to leave my job in Ottawa for a year of research and the taxpayers of the United Kingdom and the staff of the Census Microdata Unit at Manchester University who provided free of charge the data which was central to my research.  I hope the final result in some small way justifies their investment in me.

 

Finally, and most importantly, I would like to thank the cast of friends, family and teachers without whom none of my academic work would have been possible.  From storing boxes, offering prayer or encouragement, to the Herculean task of getting some knowledge of mathematics into my thick skull, I am in their debt.

 

I would like to dedicate the work that I have done for my dissertation to three people in particular.  First, to my late grandmother Ida Conner who made my studies possible, secondly to my grandfather A.M Butler from whom I learned the importance of using what gifts one possesses for the common good, and finally to my great grandfather Harold Butler who fell in love with Edinburgh during the First World War and who wanted to go to university.
Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction.. 1

2.0 Literature Review... 3

2.1 Differing views about the nature of sustainability. 3

2.2 Deep Ecology, Sustainable Development and Market solutions. 4

2.3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions. 8

2.4 Urban Life, Industrialisation and the Car. 12

2.5 The Automobile - Public Transportation Mix. 13

2.6 Additional Criticisms of automobile Dependency. 16

2.7 The Bicycle as Transport 19

2.8 Prior Work on Cycling in the United Kingdom.. 21

2.9 Conclusion. 22

3.0 Methodology for Studying Cycling – York and the UK.. 23

3.1 Introduction. 23

3.2 Overview of data to be employed and why. 23

3.3 Key Variables. 24

3.4 Chi-square Analysis. 26

3.5 Understanding Cycling at Local and National Levels. 28

3.6 Working with Sample Data. 30

4.0 Results. 31

4.1 Introduction. 31

4.2 Gender. 31

4.3 Age. 33

4.4 Ethnicity. 35

4.5 Social Class. 36

4.6 Housing Tenure. 37

4.7 Travel Distance. 39

4.8 Commuter Efficiency. 40

5.0 Conclusions. 43

5.1 Stabilising Greenhouse Gases Requires Significant Action. 43

5.2 Urban Travel in the Developed World Contributes to Carbon Emissions. 43

5.3 Cycling Could Alleviate Some Problems Created by Automobiles. 44

5.4 Demographically, Urban Cyclists are not a Fringe Group. 44

5.5 Cycling Appears to be Consistent with Economic Wellbeing. 45

5.6 Cycling is not the Preserve of the Young. 45

5.7 Cycling Appears to be Appropriate for Many Urban Commuters. 46

5.8 The UK Appears to Have Room to Grow in Cycle Usage. 47

5.9 Cycling and Urban Planning Are Inter-dependent 47

5.10 Summary. 48

5.11 Next steps. 49

6.0 References. 51

Appendices. 55

Appendix A Alternative Cities to York for Investigation. 55

Appendix B  The Two Percent Sample. 57

Appendix C  Variations in the Population of Cyclists. 59

Appendix D Efficiency and Public Transportations. 61

Appendix E Home Tenure by Region. 63

 


Table of Figures

 

Figure 1. 9

Figure 2. 11

Figure 3. 11

Figure 4. 13

Figure 5. 14

Figure 6. 15

Figure 7. 29

Figure 8. 32

Figure 9. 33

Figure 10. 34

Figure 11. 35

Figure 12. 36

Figure 13. 36

Figure 14. 37

Figure 15. 38

Figure 16. 39

Figure 17. 40

Figure 18. 40

Figure 19. 41

Figure 20. 56

Figure 21. 58

Figure 22. 63

 


1.0 Introduction

 

A debate about the structure of the city is currently underway in the academic and popular press and this is partially connected with the future of urban and industrial society.  Much of the debate revolves around the pervasive use of the automobile. In particular, the effects on human well being which result from automobile dependent cities.   Automobiles are cited for causing a number of harmful effects including contributions to greenhouse gases, urban sprawl, and leisure time lost to the daily commute.  This later concern has a number of consequences.  Long commutes of perhaps one hour each way in an automobile mean less time for family, community and political engagement as well as lost time for exercise and other forms of leisure.  Even for individuals who travel shorter distances, the cost of maintaining an automobile uses a significant portion of a middle-class person’s disposable income.

 

This dissertation will examine cycling as a possible solution to the urban transport problem of how to move large numbers of people over the often short concentrated distances of the city.  The research question I have set for myself is, “Can the bicycle address some of the problems associated with auto dependency in modern cities?”.  Traditionally, public transit is cast as the alternative to private automobiles in the city.  This dissertation attempts to shine some light on cycling as a lower cost and often overlooked form of urban transport.

 

The case for cycling can be made on a number of grounds.  Cycling is relatively inexpensive, it emits little or no pollution, and it is quiet.  Cycling moves at a slower pace than cars and public transport travelling at high speed, but it can be the fastest mode of transport over short distances (Tolley and Turton 1995: 211).  Bikes are relatively cheap and easy to maintain and repair.  They are easy to store and require less room to park in the city centre.  Moreover, bikes are a source of exercise.  Even in situations where someone travels 30 or more minutes by bike to get to and from work, the commuting time is combined with moderate aerobic activity. 

 

In this paper, I propose to examine some of these advantages for cycling although my discussion in the first part of the dissertation focuses more on setting the stage for cycling by examining problems with current urban transport.  In particular, I will review some of the theories framing debate on the concept of sustainability.  I will also look at the pollution argument for cycling by examining some of the issues surrounding greenhouse gas emissions.  I will then examine the role that the automobile plays in contributing to pollutants such as carbon dioxide and many others, as well as considering some of the criticisms levelled against it as undermining public and private life. 

 

In the later two thirds of the paper, I begin examining cycling directly.  I will touch on some of the community and health benefits of cycling, and I will look in some detail at the historical role of cycling as a way of demonstrating that at one time it played a far greater role in urban transport than it does today.  More significantly, I will carry out a comparison of cycling at both the local and the national level by comparing cycling in the English City of York to cycling in the UK as a whole.  This comparison will be an effort to investigate whether cycling in its modern form is primarily a fringe activity or whether it is a broadly based and popular means of travel with further room for expansion.

 

 Two subtexts run through this dissertation.  The first is that there is a potential threat to human well being and our environment posed by our dependence on automobiles for so many of our travel journeys.  Generally, there appear to be three categories of response to the perceived threat to the environment posed by our industrialised modern life.  These responses can be categorised as the market response, the sustainable development response, and the deep ecology response.  In addition to defining these concepts, I will try to put these responses in context, first by examining them in greater detail and then by examining how well they hold up against real world data for energy consumption in the transportation sector and in greenhouse gas emissions.  The second subtext is that t